| CATEGORY |
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
| Introduction |
All questions were answered completely and rationales
for the answers were clearly stated. |
All questions were answered completely, but rationales
for the all the answers were not clearly stated. |
Not all questions were answered completely, or greater
than 2 rationales for the all answers were not clearly stated. |
All questions were not answered completely. |
| Task |
All areas of the task were addressed and handled with
a high degree of sophistication. The plan demonstrated a great deal of
thought. |
At least one area of the task was not addressed. The
plan followed demonstrated a great deal of thought. |
At least two areas of the task were not addressed.
The plan followed demonstrated a moderate level of thought. |
The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that
little effort went into the development of the task. |
Process: Teamwork
(if applicable) |
It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit
created the final product. |
The team worked well together, but could have utilized
each other's skills to a better degree. |
The team had problems working together. Little collaboration
occurred. |
The final product is not the result of a collaborative
effort. The group showed no evidence of collaboration. |
| Process: Originality |
The ideas expressed demonstrate a high degree of originality. |
The ideas expressed are mostly original. |
The ideas expressed demonstrate a low degree of originality. |
There were no original ideas expressed in this project. |
| Grammar, Format , and Spelling |
The final presentation of work was free of grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors. |
The final presentation of work had 1 error related
to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. |
The final presentation of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling,
and formatting errors. |
The final presentation of work had major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors. |